Nikon D5000 12.3MP DSLR

[excelglsi]

http://www.photomalaysia.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=97677&d=1240224007

Nikon Inc. today introduced the new D5000, a DSLR camera aimed at photo enthusiasts and those new to DSLR photography. Leveraging on Nikon's expertise and technologies found in its pro-level DSLRs, the 12.3-megapixel D5000 enables users to capture not only high resolution images, but HD video as well.

The D5000 features a 11-point auto focus system with Scene Recognition System with Face Detection and a versatile 2.7" Vari-angle LCD monitor with Live View, an important tool for capturing those difficult angle shots. It also activates Subject Tracking autofocus which automatically locks onto a moving subject, even if it leaves the frame and returns. Also featured are Face Pririoty AF, Wide Area AF and Normal Area AF. The D5000's D-Movie Mode allows users to record HD movie clips (1280 x 720) at a cinematic 24 frames per second with sound and are recorded onto an inserted SD or SDHC memory card and saved as Motion JPEG AVI files for easy editing with widely available video editing software.

The 12.3-megapixel CMOS sensor is coupled with Nikon's exclusive EXPEED™ image processing system which is capable of delivering clear and low noise photos from the normal ISO range of ISO 200 to 3200, and the expanded range of Lo 1 setting of ISO 100 or a Hi 1 setting of ISO 6400.

The D5000 will be available late April or early May with an estimated price of around RM3100 for the kit which includes the AF-S NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR lens while the standalone body retails at around RM2700 (Prices are rough estimates after conversion from USD).

[jacob]

u getting?

[espn]

Waiting for FF to get cheaper... DX no longer interests me :rofl:

[jacob]

Waiting for FF to get cheaper... DX no longer interests me :rofl:

when will FF be cheaper?

[littlegenie]

Seems like Nikon newer models mostly all @ 12MP except D3X (as of april 2009).

[jacob]

Seems like Nikon newer models mostly all @ 12MP except D3X (as of april 2009).

dun required 24MP on consumers cam.

[harrynkl]

a noob question why u guys need so high MB in cam. :confused1: 20 over is a overkill

[KopiOkaya]

a noob question why u guys need so high MB in cam. :confused1: 20 over is a overkill

Even 12.3MP is overkill for most people.

[jacob]

a noob question why u guys need so high MB in cam. :confused1: 20 over is a overkill

some people want to print poster size to surround suntec building. :happy1:

[littlegenie]

dun required 24MP on consumers cam.

Maybe the pros using D3/D700/D300 might need higher MP.
The lower end can stay @ 12 MP.

[espn]

I'm contented with 6... but unfortunately my sensor is >6...

[bukitimah]

Hi, I am using a nikon d5000 af-s 18-105 mm VR lens. Is this lens good enough for macro still shot? What should I do or which lens should I buy to product better result?

[KopiOkaya]

Is this lens good enough for macro still shot? What should I do or which lens should I buy to product better result?

Consider either a macro lens or a Raynox. Raynox will be your cheapest alternative and with good techniques, you can still produce fantastic results. Just ask Bro Excleglsi. He doesn't own any macro lens but his macro pictures was published in National Geographic magazine. :thumbsup:

[bukitimah]

Can you advise the model of this Raynox lens that can be fitted into my Nikon D5000? Does it means I do manual focusing?

[KopiOkaya]

Can you advise the model of this Raynox lens that can be fitted into my Nikon D5000? Does it means I do manual focusing?

Either way, but it is better to do manual focusing (by moving your body back and forth). I think it is Raynox DCR-250, but you can PM Excelglsi to confirm. :coolnod:

[bukitimah]

I went to the web site to check out on this Raynox DCR-250. Many users give good review on this product. Unfortunately, there is no detail if it can be use for Nikon D5000 and how to use it.

Is there somewhere I can read more? The way it shows is that you mount this converter directly onto your lens. If I am using a af-s 18 - 105 mm VP lens, do I just mount on top of this?

[sunfish]

I went to the web site to check out on this Raynox DCR-250. Many users give good review on this product. Unfortunately, there is no detail if it can be use for Nikon D5000 and how to use it.

Is there somewhere I can read more? The way it shows is that you mount this converter directly onto your lens. If I am using a af-s 18 - 105 mm VP lens, do I just mount on top of this?

Here, this should give you a clearer picture,

http://www.mcgill.com.sg/images/DCR-250a.pdf

[bukitimah]

Hey thank you for the additional info, I will read it up before committing.

[bukitimah]

Hi, after reading so many articles I am information overloaded. Originally, I have taught the Raynox 250 would be an ideal start to macro but as I read, I am not too sure now. The key problem is that you need to be very close to the subject to take a macro shot of it. Am I right or wrong on this?

Of course if we buy the best macro lens, then all the technical problems are gone. For the benefit of people like me. If we wish to take macro shot of not just stationary insect but maybe those that may move away if we get too close. I suppose some tele function is necessary. Maybe at least 3 to 5 m away from the subject.

What I read of such macro lens is that it is a mixture tele and magnifying properties. That if you have a telephoto lens and add the magnifying filter to bring the image to 1:1 or bigger size.

I read this Tamron AF70-300mmF4-5.6 LD MACRO 1:2 and watch the review on youtube. It seems to suggest it is a dual purpose lens. At S$140 2nd hand,
it sound rather reasonable. Can anyone of you who had this lens fitting on a D5000 share your experience?

If I am wrong with the Raynox DR 250, please also correct me. If we mount the Raynox DR 250 on the nikon 18-105 mm VR lens, can we take macro shot at a distance of 3 meters?

[KopiOkaya]

If we mount the Raynox DR 250 on the nikon 18-105 mm VR lens, can we take macro shot at a distance of 3 meters?

You can still take a "macro" picture at 3 meters away with your 18-105 without the Raynox. But the image quality will not be the same as, say, with a Nikon 105mm Micro.

[bukitimah]

KopiOkaya, I know I can take 'macro' photo with my nikon 18 - 105 mm VR lens but to get close up, I actually digitally blow up the crop right?

What I am thinking is, if I add a magnifying lens, then the close up would be optical. This theory is like the digital and optical zooming right?

Would the Raynox or the Tamron do a better job?

[KopiOkaya]

KopiOkaya, I know I can take 'macro' photo with my nikon 18 - 105 mm VR lens but to get close up, I actually digitally blow up the crop right?

Not really. If your lens is able to zoom in to "enlarge" the subject optically, it is still considered a close up. However the image quality will not be as good as a macro lens.

What I am thinking is, if I add a magnifying lens, then the close up would be optical. This theory is like the digital and optical zooming right?

I don't understand what you meant by digital and optical zooming. Because if you are using a DSLR, there isn't a digital zoom. When you use a magnifying lens such as Raynox or close up filters, it is optical magnification still.

Would the Raynox or the Tamron do a better job?

Don't mix them up. Raynox is a magnifying lens unit and Tamron (if you meant a lens, such as the 90mm f2.8 macro) is a macro lens. They are different. Which is better? Both have their pros and cons. Maybe Bro Excelglsi can share his experiences with the Raynox.

I have seen fantastic macro pictures taken with a Raynox. And since Raynox is inexpensive, I suggest you get one to try macro photography first before taking the big plunge to buy a true macro lens. If you decided to sell it later, you won't lose much.

There are many ways to do macro photography. Beside using a Raynox or a macro lens, you can use extension tubes, extension bellow, close-up filters or reverse lens. All these utilize optical magnification.

Having a good lens is just one part macro photography. Have good lighting skills, plenty of patience and armed with the right knowledge of your subjects are equally important. Learn the basics first.

[bukitimah]

KopiOkaya, I think Raynox would be a good choice to try out. I am thinking about it too. I read many reviews and understand you need to be about 11 cm away to take the macro shot. I wonder how to take a macro of say a snake at that distance?

Most likely, I ended up taking objects with Raynox lens. Well, I am in no hurry, will check it out in my next outing with bros cleonbus at Dairy Farm this coming Saturday.

[KopiOkaya]

KopiOkaya, I think Raynox would be a good choice to try out.

Good. Try it out first before you invest your hard-earn money on a macro lens.

I wonder how to take a macro of say a snake at that distance?

11 cm distance is not that bad lah. By the way, I don't think there is any venomous snake in Singapore. Just don't go near a python that is longer than 1 metre. :sweat:

[minol]

The recent boom in DSLR sales has seen all the major manufacturers adding bulked-up or stripped-down entry level models, repositioning their offerings to make sure that anyone willing to put up with the size and weight of a DSLR will look at one of their models. The whole thing has often left existing DSLR owners a little lost - 'why isn't there a direct replacement for my camera?' - but has undoubtedly meant there are many more attractive, accessible cameras on the market just waiting to entice first-time DSLR owners.

And its into this maelstrom of DSLR proliferation that Nikon launches its latest baby DSLR, the D5000. Nikon's recent strategy of inexpensive, simplified models caused a lot of confusion. The D40, D40X and D60 removed the autofocus motor, making them smaller and less expensive but limiting the choice of lenses that could be autofocused. Despite this oft-criticised move, the cameras sold very well, prompting the major third-party lens makers to create versions of their popular budget lenses that would focus on these baby Nikons. However, it appears Nikon has again decided that simply replacing models isn't the best way to address the market. So here we have a camera that genuinely seems to sit above the D60 (rather than continuing in parallel until the stock runs out), and below the D90. Like the baby Nikons, the D5000 doesn't have an autofocus motor built into the body but does gain a tilt-and-swivel LCD.http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/nikon-d5000-1-480x360.jpg